| R. Lewis Dark:
Less Money for Labs Is International Trend
TOO OFTEN THESE DAYS, labs are asked to accept less money. This is true in
the United States and in many developed countries around the world.
Many of you know that the latest version of the Senate health reform bill
recently released by Max Baucus (D-Montana) calls for all providers to pay
a "fee" as one source of revenue to fund the proposed expansion of healthcare
services. In the case of laboratory testing, the Senate bill pencils in laboratory testing for $750 million in annual fees. That would be a unique new
source of government revenue and would be assessed even as the same
Senate bill mandates a reduction in fees paid for lab testing services. It presents clinical labs and anatomic pathology groups in this country with a revenue double-whammy. (See pages 7-8.)
However, compared to what's happening to private laboratory testing
companies in New Zealand, U.S. pathologists and laboratory executives
should consider themselves fortunate that they still have the opportunity to
provide laboratory testing services to patients and physicians. In New
Zealand, the government health service, at both the national and local levels,
is acting as if "profit" is an element that saps money out of available
funding for health services.
Beginning early in this decade, at a regional level, district health boards in
some regions began awarding exclusive, multi-year contracts. In these communities, to bid andwin, competing private pathology labs had to join together and forma single lab provider company. In return, the government granted the new lab joint venture a monopoly in that market for the term of the contract.
Where it gets interesting is at the end of thesemonopoly contracts. In the case of Auckland, as that first lab testing contract ended, under questionable bidding circumstances the district health boards awarded the next eight-year contract to a brand new lab company-which had no laboratory and no staff in Auckland to service this contract! This new lab company offered a bid that was 20% lower than what was offered by the existing contract holder. (See Pages 3-6.)
As you read this, the patients and physicians in greater Auckland are experiencing
the first consequences of this new money-saving lab testing contract,
which became effective September 7. Critics will be watching to learn if the district
health boardswill truly realize the projected reduction in the cost of lab testing,
without causing a serious decline in the quality of lab testing services.
Not getting The Dark Report in your mailbox every 3 weeks?
Lab Test Fiasco Unfolding
In Auckland, New Zealand
District Health Boards scramble to address
deficiencies in performance of the new lab provider
CEO SUMMARY: This may be the shortest lab testing contract
honeymoon ever. Just ten days after LabTests became
responsible for an exclusive, eight-year lab testing contract
covering the Auckland area, problems with its service and
operation caused District Health Board (DHB) officials to put
the lab on notice. DHB employees are also now working inside
LabTests to oversee safety and quality assurance. Meanwhile,
the press is airing the complaints of patients and physicians.
Audacious Lab Contract
Shows Downside Risks
Auckland patients and physicians now coping with the "lowest cost" laboratory testing company
CEO SUMMARY: In Auckland, New Zealand, unfolding events
may soon reveal the answer to a long-standing question in pathology:
is there a point where deep cuts to payment for lab testing
causes such a decline in quality and service that other health
services undergo disruption? District Health Boards, to save about
20% of their lab budget, replaced a highly-rated lab testing company
with a new entrant to Auckland. Since the changeover on
September 7, patients and doctors have voiced their complaints.
$750 Million Lab Test Tax
Proposed in Senate Bill
Latest Senate health reform bill includes tax
on lab tests, along with reduction in reimbursement
CEO SUMMARY: A bill that may be the U.S. Senate's framework
for reforming the U.S. healthcare system calls for a tax
of $750 million per year to be paid by lab testing companies.
The proposed bill also calls for a reduction in Medicare reimbursement
for lab testing. One positive element was that reinstatement
of the Medicare lab test co-pay was dropped from
this version of the health reform bill. THE DARK REPORT provides
details of how the Senate bill would determine the amount of
tax each lab testing company would pay annually.
Textbook Marketing Fuels
Demand for BRCA Test
Direct-to-consumer advertising is one tool
Myriad uses to drive sales of cancer risk testing
CEO SUMMARY: In today's lab testing marketplace, the hot
ticket is to introduce a proprietary or patent-protected molecular
test for cancer. The sales and marketing model inspiring
many of these new lab testing companies is that used by Myriad
Genetics, Inc. since it introduced its BRACAnalysis test for breast
cancer back in 1996. A new report by William Blair & Company,
LLC, analyzes Myriad's successes. Pathologists and lab administrators
will find useful insights about techniques they can use
to market their own specialized lab testing services.
Clinical Study Update: Some Docs Fail to Tell Patients
About Critical Results 25% of Time
Medicare Pays Doctors
To Switch to E-Prescribing
Medicare incentive adds 2% for e-prescribing
in 2009 and 2010, then changes to 1% for 2011
CEO SUMMARY: It's a major step on the road to integration
of healthcare informatics. During the next few years, the
Medicare program is offering financial incentives to encourage
office-based physicians to adopt e-prescribing. This is a positive
development for local laboratories and hospital lab outreach
programs. Early-adopter labs are already taking steps to
enable e-prescribing as part of the electronic lab test
order/results reporting systems they offer to client physicians.
Informatics Update: E-Prescribing Functions that Labs
Can Offer Office-Based Physicians
E-prescribing Is Example of Need
For Labs to Support Connectivity
INTELLIGENCE: Late & Latent
UCSF AND ABBOTT
PARTNER TO IDENTIFY
UNKNOWN VIRUSESADD TO: VIRUS ID
Call us today if you have Charter Membership questions at 800-560-6363 or 512-264-7103 The Dark Report intelligence briefing is delivered to your mailbox every 3 weeks!
|