Dark Report The Dark Report The Dark Report The Dark Report The Dark Report The Dark Report
About The Dark Report
Current Issue Archive Sample Copy Subscribe
shim
Home
shim
The Dark Report
shim
Executive War College
shim
Income Symposium
shim
Audiotapes
shim
Contact Us
The Dark Report
 

       Headlines - August 6, 2012
          Order Article PDF or Hardcopies / Apply for Charter Membersip Today!

R. Lewis Dark: Time for Congress to Properly Fix CLIA PT Issue

THIS TIME, THE PROVERBIAL CAT MAY BE OUT OF THE BAG when it comes to longstanding dissatisfaction with how federal regulators interpret and enforce CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) regulations as they relate to inadvertent errors in the referral of proficiency tests (PT).

For many in the clinical laboratory profession, this issue of THE DARK REPORT will be their first news about the situation at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC), where CLIA officials have sent notice that the laboratory’s CLIA license could be revoked, effective August 10, 2012, and subject to appeal. The sanction is the result of the unintended referral of proficiency testing specimens. It was a situation that the OSUWMC lab self-reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (See pages 3-7.)

Can you remember the last time it was publicly known that a major, respected laboratory organization had its CLIA license revoked? The closest episode to cancellation that I can recall would be on February 23, 2002. That was when CMS officials issued to Specialty Laboratories, Inc., a "cancellation of approval to receive Medicare payment for all laboratory services." So, even in that dramatic case, Specialty’s CLIA license was not revoked. In fact, Specialty's CLIA license cancellation only lasted until June 18, 2002—just 116 days!

So now the entire clinical lab profession will watch as the laboratory of a respected academic medical center could be stripped of its CLIA license because of the inadvertent referral of six proficiency testing specimens since 2009. In the event that CMS prevails at appeal, it could leave OSUWMC officials no option but to transfer ownership of the lab to a new entity and find a new lab director. This process will likely cost millions of dollars for a lab organization the size of OSUWMC. And what will be achieved by this particular CLIA sanction?

The same lab facility will operate with the same lab instruments, manned by the same staff following the same protocols—except as modified in the wake of the root cause analysis for the PT specimen referrals. The only difference will be that the lab will have a new owner and a new laboratory director.

This and similar CLIA license revocations are why members of Congress sponsored bills in both houses to address the CLIA statute's proficiency testing "Catch 22" language that is the cause of this situation. It would be timely for all of us to contact our members of Congress and urge passage of these bills.

Not getting The Dark Report in your mailbox every 3 weeks?






CLIA PT Enforcement Ensnares Top Labs

Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center faces loss of its laboratory's Medicare license

CEO SUMMARY: Think it can't happen to you? Think again. Following self-disclosure of inadvertent referrals of proficiency testing (PT) specimens, the laboratory at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) was visited by officials from the Ohio Department of Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Following that survey, CMS sent notice to the OSUWMC laboratory that its CLIA license would be revoked, on August 10, 2012, in the absence of an appeal.



CMS Proposes Sanctions Against OSU Laboratory

Procedural PT errors cause CMS to send notice of revocation of lab’s CLIA license

CEO SUMMARY: As its reward for self-reporting the referral of six proficiency testing (PT) specimens in three years, the laboratory at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) has been told by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that its CLIA license could be revoked, subject to appeal by the laboratory. Here are the details of this story, as presented in a letter prepared by OSUWMC’s laboratory director and sent to CMS officials.



Existing CLIA Language Drives PT Enforcement

CMS officials interpret CLlA law in a manner that some say does not meet the intent of Congress

CEO SUMMARY: Revocation of a lab's CLIA license as penalty for inadvertent errors in handling proficiency tests (PT) is not a new problem. As explained here, most clinical laboratories have appropriate protocols for handling PT samples. But, when errors occur, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), based on its current interpretation of the CLIA law, does not distinguish between an intentional effort to cheat the proficiency test process and an inadvertent PT error.



CMS and CAP Comment On CLIA PT Matters

CLIA statute is enforced by CMS based on strict interpretation of the law's language

CEO SUMMARY: Federal regulators rely on interpretations from administrative law judges (ALJ) for guidance in how to apply the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) as they pertain to proficiency testing (PT) and the issue of inadvertent PT referrals. Representatives of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) provide comments about this issue and offer insight as to how laboratories can comply with the law.



Lawyer Questions CMS Over Inadvertent PT Errors

Revoking Medicare license and suspending lab’s medical director not likely intent of Congress

CEO SUMMARY: In the case of the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) clinical lab, one attorney with long experience in CLIA regulatory matters says that the facts do not support the severe sanctions that CLIA officials may impose on a healthcare organization that is widely-respected nationally. While the lab did commit errors in its handling of PT specimens, the errors were inadvertent; it self-reported the errors; then instituted systemic changes to prevent recurrence of the same errors.



Congress May Respond to Tough CLIA PT Penalties

Two bills are a response to laboratory sanctions imposed for inadvertent PT violations under CLIA

CEO SUMMARY: For years, severe penalties in cases where a laboratory has inadvertently erred in handling proficiency testing (PT) specimens have been a point of contention between the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the clinical laboratory profession. Two bills proposed in Congress would give CMS more discretion in how it interprets the language in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA).



INTELLIGENCE: Late & Latent

• ONTARIO HOSPITALS FORM REGIONAL LAB NETWORK

• Earlier this month, Ernst & Young announced the selection of Tonya Mallory as Entrepreneur of the Year for the Greater Washington Region.






Call us today if you have Charter Membership questions at 800-560-6363 or 512-264-7103
The Dark Report intelligence briefing is delivered to your mailbox every 3 weeks!

See Recent Dark Report Stories and Topics That You May Have Missed!

 

Copyright 2012 © DarkReport.com All rights reserved worldwide •