| R. Lewis Dark:
For Better or for Worse: Nation Has New Health Law
CONGRESS AND THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION HAVE THEIR HEALTH LAW. Whether
this new law serves the citizens of this country for the better or for the worse will
not be known for several years into the future.
I suspect that many of our elected officials in the House and Senate do not
fully understand the major elements of the health bill that has just become law.
I believe I amalso on safe ground to state the opinion that few of these "servants
of the people" actually took the 2,700+ pages of the bill and perused themcarefully
before deciding how to cast their vote.
Therein lies the rub. First, these legislators have exempted themselves and
their Congressional staffs from the health mandates that they are imposing on
the remainder of the country. They know this insulates themselves and their
families from whatever negative consequences develop fromthe parts of the new
law which prove detrimental to the healthcare system. As an American citizen of
good standing, I find it sad that our political leaders deliberately take themselves
out of the legislative solution they consider best for the nation.
Second, in coming years, none of us should be surprised when various unintended
consequences of this health law become obvious and troublesome.
Expect these same senators and representatives to tell news reporters that "I didn't
know that was in the bill," or "I didn't understand how this specific mandate
would cause health providers to change the way they practiced medicine."
Forgive me for being skeptical about these developments. Like many of you,
early last year I was hopeful that the goal of improving our nation's health system
would include a robust exploration of innovative ways to organize healthcare.
Healthcare's "best practices" examples, such as Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, and Geisinger Health, would be studied by policymakers
and legislators. As part of the health bill, seed funding to encourage similar
"health innovation incubators" would be authorized with the goal of
covering more people at lower cost while achieving improved health outcomes.
On this point, I am not aware of any provision in the new law that financially
encourages a health system, hospital, or physician group to experiment with innovative
ways to organize and deliver healthcare. I amwilling to be proven wrong on
this point. If you know of such a provision, contact me at our editorial offices. In the meantime, like most of you, I am reserving judgement about whether this health law
is good for our country. Like the residents of Missouri, I say "Show me."
Not getting The Dark Report in your mailbox every 3 weeks?
2.3% Medical Device Tax Hits Clinical Labs in 2013
Newly-enacted health reform bill requires
medical device companies to pay excise tax
CEO SUMMARY: One aspect of the massive new health bill
is that medical device companies will pay a 2.3% tax, effective
January 1, 2013. Students of economics know that it is customers
who invariably end up paying such direct taxes. Thus,
clinical laboratories in the United States should prepare to see
this 2.3% tax show up as a line item on sales contracts and in
the form of higher prices for in vitro diagnostics analyzers, lab
equipment, reagents, consumables, and even medical software.
Business Advantages From Whole Slide Imaging
* WSI creates ways to significantly improve
collaboration between pathologists and physicians
CEO SUMMARY: Whole slide imaging (WSI) is a niche product
today, but it offers the potential to redefine the practice of pathology.
That's the opinion of pathologists presenting at a digital
pathology workshop last month. One pathologist explained how
WSI significantly improves collaboration between pathologists and
referring physicians. Another pathologist explained how regulators
soon may require standards for WSI and why such standards are
likely to result in a call for standards for light microscopes as well.
Use of Point-of-Care Testing
Reduces Mortality by 50%
In a thinly-populated region
the size of Texas and New Mexico combined, an
integrated clinical care program based on point-of-care
testing (POCT) has delivered impressive gains
in health outcomes. For rural residents, mortality
rates from cardiovascular disease have fallen by
50%. There were comparable declines in hospital
length of stay and the rate of readmissions. A reliable
test result and speed to answer fromPOC testing
is a major factor in these improved outcomes.
Serious Problems Plague
Newfoundland Laboratory
Inaccurate cyclosporine test results trigger
lab director resignations and more media scrutiny
Newfoundland's St. John laboratory was
rocked by revelations in February that its cyclosporine testing
was flawed, exposing patients to the harmful affects from
inappropriately high doses of the immunosuppressant drug.
Within weeks of this news, the Chief of Laboratory Medicine
resigned. Now a team from Toronto's University Health
Network (UHN) is at the laboratory to conduct a review of operations
and make recommendations to the health authority.
INTELLIGENCE: Late & Latent
JUAN ROSAI, MD'S
CASES TO BE PUT
IN DIGITAL ARCHIVE
PHLEBOTOMIST
GETS LUCKY,
WINS $111,250
Call us today if you have Charter Membership questions at 800-560-6363 or 512-264-7103 The Dark Report intelligence briefing is delivered to your mailbox every 3 weeks!
|